I've read the white paper that describes the work-around for the pitot-static testing bug.
In Canada, we need to have a static system and transponder certification every two years. This means that a certified avionics shop does the testing. I've had this performed several times.
It is unlikely that the avionics shops are familiar with this white paper. Does this mean that my EFIS dynamic calibration is no longer trustworthy?
I strongly suggest that you introduce a 'calibration' mode that will allow service techs to properly test the EFIS without the constant power-up/power-down sequences. All they need to see is altitude and airspeed during this calibration mode.
Also, how do we establish new dynamic calibration after a standard pitot/static check (ii.e. not using the bug work around)?
Vern
In Canada, we need to have a static system and transponder certification every two years. This means that a certified avionics shop does the testing. I've had this performed several times.
It is unlikely that the avionics shops are familiar with this white paper. Does this mean that my EFIS dynamic calibration is no longer trustworthy?
I strongly suggest that you introduce a 'calibration' mode that will allow service techs to properly test the EFIS without the constant power-up/power-down sequences. All they need to see is altitude and airspeed during this calibration mode.
Also, how do we establish new dynamic calibration after a standard pitot/static check (ii.e. not using the bug work around)?
Vern