FPL Transfer/Sharing between G430W and Skyview

bkthomps

I love flying!
Joined
Sep 17, 2012
Messages
72
Location
Atlanta, GA
Is there any plan in the future to transfer the FPL from the ARNIC429 source?

I'd love to be able to view my flight plan on the map screen as well as the GPS I am using to GPSS the flight plan, if this isn't even in the works, please let me know that as well
 

dynonsupport

Dynon Technical Support
Staff member
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Messages
13,226
This is planned for sure, but isn't something we're actively working on right now.
 

RV711AC

Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2011
Messages
65
If it will help encourage you to work on this you have my vote. It would be good to only enter the flight plan once. Of course I prefer to enter it into the Dynon and transfer to the 430 W.
 

bkthomps

I love flying!
Joined
Sep 17, 2012
Messages
72
Location
Atlanta, GA
or it would be good to have all of the GPS waypoints for a procedure loaded onto the skyview map screen

this would put skyview one step closer to an IFR solution which I believe Robert indicated they desired to enter that space/market
 

flaude

New Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
80
this is also smothing that I would really like to have.

I think also that a small keyboard would be a really good idea when you have to edit waypoint or find an airfield.
 

johnsteichen

New Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2010
Messages
227
It makes far more sense for the primary IFR navigator 430/530/GTN 650/gtn 750 to cross fill the dynon. Amendments to the flight , addition of an instrument procedure, etc are made in the primary IFR navigator. The map function in the Dynon will never be a fully functional IFR navigator. IMHO.
 

thibault

Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2009
Messages
191
John S. has it exactly right.

Another vote for cross fill from the primary IFR navigator to the Dynon system not the other way around.
 

bkthomps

I love flying!
Joined
Sep 17, 2012
Messages
72
Location
Atlanta, GA
It makes far more sense for the primary IFR navigator 430/530/GTN 650/gtn 750 to cross fill the dynon.  Amendments  to the flight , addition of an instrument procedure, etc are made in the primary IFR navigator.  The map function in the Dynon will never be a fully functional IFR navigator. IMHO.


this is essentially what I was referring to, I guess I did not state it well- Basically I think the fact that the two don't communicate is something from a code perspective that can be easily fixed. I never want to push from dynon->garmin, i always want to do it from 430>skyview
 
L

larrynew

Guest
Another vote for flight plan crossfill 430W > Skyview. Shopping for both right now.
 

bkthomps

I love flying!
Joined
Sep 17, 2012
Messages
72
Location
Atlanta, GA
I think the workaround in the meantime is I am going to take the RNAV approaches i use the most and load all of the waypoints into saved flight plans, this will save me some typing while in flight
 
Top