In a typical installation (all nextgen Dynon), the pitot/static/aoa could be routed to one location (wing tip or aft fuse makes sense).
However, if there are any instruments on the panel that require them (such as a backup D10A), alternate static source or mechanical instruments, this requires routing the lines to the panel as well.
This tends to offend my sensibilities for design elegance. For a wingtip installation, it also puts the low point of the static system in the wing root, which prevents the proper construction of an in-flight accessible static drain.
Aft-fuse or tail mounted AHARS may still allow a proper static drain to be constructed at a low point somewhere near the panel, so this may be a better location for the AHARS for this reason. Still not very elegant.
Since we are on the topic, this might be a good time to lobby for a modified AOA/PITOT. Sounds like if a static port could be incorporated into it, then a wingtip mounted AHARS would be ideal. Then, the three air lines could run from the AOA/PITOT/STATIC probe a short distance to the wingtip. The static port itself would be the low point, and it could be heated. Alternate static would still require a Tee and an air line to the cockpit.
It would be VERY nice if the new AHARS could talk to the D10A as well, eliminating the need for the pitot/static/aoa connections to be routed to the panel for a backup instrument. Two AHARSs can be connected easily in one wingtip for redundancy as well.
Sorry for the long post, but you see that packing everything into one box has knock-on consequences.
Vern Little