I frequently look at NRST airport while flying over water or inhospitable terrain. While crossing the great lakes, I fly at an altitude that would allow me to glide to land. However, it's not easy to judge the range you could glide to while factoring wind speed and direction. I would like to see a tool that once programmed with your glide ratio could depict on the map an area within reach if your engine quits. This tool would factor, altitude, best glide and wind conditions. Ideally, suitable airports could be highlighted within that area in order of runway length and alignment with wind direction.
Best glide range
- Thread starter bernardsv
- Start date
Even better, use GPS ground speed, GPS track and actual rate of descent to provide a fairly accurate estimation of your glide range, compensated for terrain. For all other headings away from your current track it would be an estimate. SkyView already has the GPS ground speed, GPS rate of descent, GPS track, winds aloft and a terrain information required to do this.
It was discussed on this forum back in March: http://dynonavionics.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1426253291/3#3
Dynon's sister company AFS has such a feature--see the AF5000 user manual, page 61 (the EMERGENCY Airport Button feature).
I agree, this would be a really nice feature.
I agree, this would be a really nice feature.
cmgolden
I love flying!
Nice feature by AFS. It would be a good first step on Skyview to be able to set a bug for a best glide speed on the airspeed tape. I miss that feature on my prior EFIS.
K
KRviator
Guest
Given best glide speed varies with weight, you would need to input your ZFW before every flight, and have a lookup table to determine the speed based on current gross weight.
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2005
- Messages
- 13,226
So we can get any implementation we do of this as accurate as possible, why do you want this feature?
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2005
- Messages
- 13,226
While a distinct AoA mark allows you to target a best glide ratio, this doesn't allow the EFIS to know what it is ahead of time so we can't draw a glide ring from that.
I was looking at the AOA mark as a separate issue, sort of. The best glide AOA mark would be set during the flight test period, during which the glide ratio for that AOA would also be determined and written down.
User would input that glide ratio (see the AFS system, except instead of Vglide and sink, I'd have the user input glide ratio) and minimum runway length in a config page.
I am missing something in this thread. This feature (glide amoeba) has been in use by gliders for years. No need to input any data or enter any setting except how high you want to be at the arrival point. Here is a link to a glider computer with the glide amoeba feature I am talking about.
http://www.clearnav.net/main/cn-overview-1.html
SkyView, connected to a GPS receiver, already has all the information needed for this feature.
http://www.clearnav.net/main/cn-overview-1.html
SkyView, connected to a GPS receiver, already has all the information needed for this feature.
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2005
- Messages
- 13,226
From the ClearNav manual:
That glider computer requires you to enter the weight of the aircraft and a bunch of other info (Glider polar is weight, and multiple glide speeds, MC is how efficient you are in turns, and bug % is how clean the wings are of bugs!)
So without having the installer input a bunch of info about the plane, and then the pilot entering the weight every flight, SkyView does not already have all the info needed to do an accurate glide ring.
That glider computer requires you to enter the weight of the aircraft and a bunch of other info (Glider polar is weight, and multiple glide speeds, MC is how efficient you are in turns, and bug % is how clean the wings are of bugs!)
So without having the installer input a bunch of info about the plane, and then the pilot entering the weight every flight, SkyView does not already have all the info needed to do an accurate glide ring.
Glide ratio is not affected by weight. Pretty much all you need to calculate a glide ring is your AGL height, glide ratio of the airplane, and corrections for terrain and wind. Only one of those values needs to be entered up front.
The other inputs you see in reference to the glider computer are used to generate information helpful for racing gliders, which isn't applicable here. For example, degradation due to bugs adds up during a six hour long glide, but its impact on a 12 minute descent will be inconsequential.
The other inputs you see in reference to the glider computer are used to generate information helpful for racing gliders, which isn't applicable here. For example, degradation due to bugs adds up during a six hour long glide, but its impact on a 12 minute descent will be inconsequential.
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2005
- Messages
- 13,226
Glide ratio is not affected by weight, but optimal glide speed is. You need to know the speed that will be flown if you want to calculate the effects of wind. A heavier airplane arrives at the ground faster, so the wind affects it less.
In an engine out scenario, I seriously doubt any powered pilots will fly a weight-compensated max L/D speed--they will fly the single "best glide" speed they've memorized for their airplane.
Even if they did fly an adjusted airspeed, the difference due to wind exposure time is minimal. Using numbers from my Lancair 360 in a worst-case (for this) scenario glide:
So, if SkyView calculated the glide ring based on a single fixed speed...in the worst scenario I can conceive, the prediction will be pessimistic by 3 miles. I can definitely live with that!
Bottom line: I don't expect SV's glide prediction to be anywhere close to perfect. It can't possibly know a 3D model of the winds below me, or how the airplane will glide with no propeller and a big hole up front.
However, if it draws an amoeba based on current winds, terrain, and a reasonable guess at aircraft performance...that information will be IMMEDIATELY helpful if the engine quits. I'll turn in the direction of the longest arm of the amoeba that points toward a runway.
Even if they did fly an adjusted airspeed, the difference due to wind exposure time is minimal. Using numbers from my Lancair 360 in a worst-case (for this) scenario glide:
Code:
Starting at 18000 AGL, 50 kt headwind, 14:1 glide ratio. Max L/D speed bone-dry with one 120 lb pilot is 100 KIAS. Max L/D speed at maximum gross weight is 118 KIAS.
Lightweight, the glide takes 0.42 hours, and into the 50 kt headwind, will travel 21 nm.
Heavyweight, the glide takes 0.36 hrs and travels 24 nm.So, if SkyView calculated the glide ring based on a single fixed speed...in the worst scenario I can conceive, the prediction will be pessimistic by 3 miles. I can definitely live with that!
Bottom line: I don't expect SV's glide prediction to be anywhere close to perfect. It can't possibly know a 3D model of the winds below me, or how the airplane will glide with no propeller and a big hole up front.
However, if it draws an amoeba based on current winds, terrain, and a reasonable guess at aircraft performance...that information will be IMMEDIATELY helpful if the engine quits. I'll turn in the direction of the longest arm of the amoeba that points toward a runway.
cmgolden
I love flying!
Va speed is shown on Skyview's airspeed tape despite weight's affect on it. I'd be pleased to also be able to set a glide speed. It need not vary by weight, but it'll be a close approximation based on weights typically flown. Same could apply to the range rings discussed. Approximate information is better than no information IMHO.
I’d prefer to see the available fields in “nearest” calculated using the current true airspeed and rate of descent along with Dynon's calculated winds. The pilot would need to input table values for the amount of altitude lost in a 90 and 180 degree turn as well as two altitudes to be at when reaching the field.
One to be preferred and the other minimum. My choices would be 1000 and 400. Others may choose 0 for minimum.
With this, all fields within a 360 deg area (not a circle) could be indicated with a green circle around the field for preferred and yellow for minimum.
As the descent progressed and the winds changed, the depiction of the fields would change. Downwind fields that initially looked good would decrease while upwind ones would improve. Flight testing this feature might prove to a real learning experience as to capability of the plane/pilot combination.
One to be preferred and the other minimum. My choices would be 1000 and 400. Others may choose 0 for minimum.
With this, all fields within a 360 deg area (not a circle) could be indicated with a green circle around the field for preferred and yellow for minimum.
As the descent progressed and the winds changed, the depiction of the fields would change. Downwind fields that initially looked good would decrease while upwind ones would improve. Flight testing this feature might prove to a real learning experience as to capability of the plane/pilot combination.
Schorsch
Member
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2015
- Messages
- 66
bump
Foreflight added a Glide Advisor: Using terrain, GPS data, winds aloft, and your aircraft’s best glide speed and ratio, ForeFlight shapes a glide range ring around your ownship icon on the moving map display.
Of course Dynon's "amoeba" glide ring will be much better because we'll have actual winds aloft, not just the forecast that Foreflight has to use.
Foreflight added a Glide Advisor: Using terrain, GPS data, winds aloft, and your aircraft’s best glide speed and ratio, ForeFlight shapes a glide range ring around your ownship icon on the moving map display.
Of course Dynon's "amoeba" glide ring will be much better because we'll have actual winds aloft, not just the forecast that Foreflight has to use.