High CHT notification

jdubner

Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2006
Messages
148
Location
Independence, OR
Dynon Support: reference the #1 CHT in the screen capture (below), is this expected behavior?  I.e. is the background of the CHT reading supposed to revert from yellow to black for an alarm (red) condition?

(IIRC my CHTs are set to indicate yellow up to 420 and red from 420 to 500.)


HighCHT.png
 

Schorsch

Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2015
Messages
66
The redline is the EGT? And savvyanalysis.com would be my next stop to check into it...
 

preid

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2010
Messages
754
Location
SoCal
red line is the CHT. My guess is look at the setup for the cylinders and verify that you have the red starting at 420F I had this issue when i think I either had a gap between two settings (ie 419 for yellow and 420 for red for you, make the yellow 420 and the red 420.
Dynon Support will know for sure, but in the meantime thats my guess, if you are pressed to check something.
 

swatson999

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2010
Messages
1,533
I think his question was: shouldn't the *numerical* readout on the left be something like white lettering on a red background (to which I would say yes, that's what any of my display widgets show when something goes into the red alarm area).
 

DBRV10

Active Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2008
Messages
926
Location
Brisbane, Qld. Australia
Joe, just an observation. Your CHTs are high, you seem to be very rich and the EGT is low.

Are you running an EI? and if so how well timed is it? Just a guess but the spark timing seems to be too advanced.

Also the little baffle plates in the front of the air intakes might need removing?

Just some food for thought.
 

preid

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2010
Messages
754
Location
SoCal
Joel
David is a GAMI guru so take his free advice seriously. If you do indeed have the top as your CHT#1 cut that aluminum down and you'll get the temps down.
Back to your question:
I mentioned before that you need to assure that the temps overlap. (range 2 top and range 1 bottom are the same temp) if they are not you'll get the issue you have.
range2_valid=1
range2_top=435
range2_bot=400
range2_name=
range2_color=YELLOW
range3_valid=1
range3_top=475
range3_bot=435
range3_name=
range3_color=RED
 

preid

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2010
Messages
754
Location
SoCal
Joe;
tried contacting you offline but was rejected.
In summary with your .DFG
all ranges should fit within the Max_display and Min_display so in your case
Min_display 0 or 200 (as you have) to match number on range1_bot.
Max_display=500.
 

dynonsupport

Dynon Technical Support
Staff member
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Messages
13,226
Joe,
I note that neither the WARNING button nor the "423" is highlighted, yet the EGT bar is.

My guess is that you had not acknowledged the EGT warning yet, and the "423" and the WARNING button were flashing. They alternate RED and BLACK. If you take a screenshot, you could take it during the moment they were black.

Did you actually observe it not turning red and flashing in flight, or was this just something noticed in the screenshot?

Once acknowledged by pressing the WARNING button they should go solid red and otherwise look like the items in yellow.
 

jdubner

Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2006
Messages
148
Location
Independence, OR
Thank you.  Alas, I cannot remember the sequence of events: this was one minute after takeoff in a heavy, high-density altitude situation with high terrain.  I was preoccupied flying the airplane and could have instinctively pressed the WARNING button in response to the high CHT audible warning.  Later when downloading my screenshots and engine log, I was puzzled by what I saw.

The theory of alternating red/black sounds very likely and I'll go with that <g>.

But there should never be any EGT alarms: my .DFG file shows red only above 1550 (so I'm not troubled by nuisance alarms).
 

preid

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2010
Messages
754
Location
SoCal
Not a EGT issue at all, if anything they are very low. I think support meant CHT.
Update the .DFG with the max display as i recommended and let us know if that solves the issue.
 

dynonsupport

Dynon Technical Support
Staff member
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Messages
13,226
Yes, sorry, CHT.

This does totally look like a screenshot taken during the flashing. His settings are not wrong- if they were the CHT bar would not be red and the message button would not say WARNING. The system clearly knows 423 is an alert value.

It all comes down to if the screenshot was taken before or after the CHT alarm was acknowledged. So many unrelated things would need to be broken (like our warning button not being red even though it says WARNING not MESSAGE), that it seems really unlikely this is a bug.
 

DBRV10

Active Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2008
Messages
926
Location
Brisbane, Qld. Australia
David is a GAMI guru so take his free advice seriously.

Not sure about GURU status that belongs with George Braly, Tim Roehl and the guys like John Paul Townsend who work for them.

I do however run the Advanced Pilot Seminars engine classes in Australia and I do work with the GAMI folk so yeah, I can help. ;)

Set your CHT alarms to yellow at 380, and red by 400/410. If you ever get a preignition event you want as much arming as you can get, but you do not ant nuisance alarms that you will ignore.

As for my earlier comments please consider them as the numbers are talking to me.
 

mmarien

Murray M.
Joined
Dec 26, 2009
Messages
1,206
Location
Saskatoon SK CAN
Are you running an EI? and if so how well timed is it? Just a guess but the spark timing seems to be too advanced.
David - way off topic but interested in your thoughts. FYI WOT will bring the spark advance back to 25 BTDC on any EI so it's working like a MAG would. Other than the CHT anomaly on the display it looks like a typical climb out in hot weather from a high elevation. I agree that high CHT and low EGT are a sign of detonation but with a MAP of 19 (52% power) it's probably a unlikely possibility. Yes No? :-?
 

dynonsupport

Dynon Technical Support
Staff member
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Messages
13,226
Mmarien,
Unless your EFI has a throttle position sensor, then WOT doesn't bring the timing back to 25 degrees unless you are at sea level. It likely uses MAP to determine timing, and that timing will only be 25 degrees at 100% power.

Just a point of thought.
 

mmarien

Murray M.
Joined
Dec 26, 2009
Messages
1,206
Location
Saskatoon SK CAN
Yes, good point, I'll have to agree. The spark advance does change with MAP but it makes sense that only a very high MAP will move the timing back to the minimum.

I did do some experimenting last year after reading Mike Busch's article about controlling the combustion event. Here is a screen shot of the spark angle at WOT and another with the throttle pulled back to about 18 inches MAP. WOT at 3500 feet doesn't bring the timing back to the minimum. I think the factory preset minimum for PMags is 20 BTDC.

So if Joe Dubner did have electronic ignition, at 19 inches MAP the spark would be advanced. Still in no danger of detonation with a power setting of 52% is what I was trying to point out.

Capture1.PNG


Capture2.PNG
 

DBRV10

Active Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2008
Messages
926
Location
Brisbane, Qld. Australia
I realise this is a Dynon thread, not an engine management thread, but this is good education for anyone reading. I will try to cover these matters one at a time so hang in there.

Are you running an EI? and if so how well timed is it? Just a guess but the spark timing seems to be too advanced.
David - way off topic but interested in your thoughts. FYI WOT will bring the spark advance back to 25 BTDC on any EI so it's working like a MAG would. Other than the CHT anomaly on the display it looks like a typical climb out in hot weather from a high elevation. I agree that high CHT and low EGT are a sign of detonation but with a MAP of 19 (52% power) it's probably a unlikely possibility. Yes No? :-?

WOT does bring the EI back to its "Base setting" and this is not always 25DBTDC, and is often 26 or even more as has been reported elsewhere. There is something else to consider. And this is important;
a. In a magneto there is lag between the static timing (say 25 degrees) and the actual plug firing (dynamic) and on a typical IO360 this is a couple of degrees. On some engines it is much more (think Chieftains). This all adds up to several degrees earlier sparks than the maker intended.

b. More advance does not give more power, in fact the curve is pretty flat and then it starts losing power. The Dyno does not make this up!

A bit of advance is useful at low powers and with lean mixtures but we are not talking about much, and far less than the EI's deliver. It is true you can run to almost zero fuel type lean with an EI and the mag won't do it, but in a realistic sense who flies like that and there are other ways to achieve the same result. But thats another topic for another day.

I agree that high CHT and low EGT are a sign of detonation but with a MAP of 19 (52% power) it's probably a unlikely possibility. Yes No?
No. Common misconception. Lets get detonation out of the way first. On a conforming N/A engine with conforming fuel there will never be any at any mixture even at high powers or full rated. You should see what we have to do to get it :eek: That being said timing set outside the spec, (which the EI always is even if only just a tiny bit) and running say mogas, on a hot day, hot oil, and CHT's above 420, now we have a recipe for starting some. But it is not likely and on these engines very hard to do, but it is possible if you get all the ingredients right.

by the way detonation only occurs between about 35dF-75dF ROP. If you go richer, or leaner, it goes away really fast. Popular myth is you will get it LOP, it has been proven to be not true. But the myths take some killing off.

As for the CHT climbing and EGT dropping, that is not from detonation. Detonation has symptoms of EGT staying around the normal and CHT climbing quickly.

Preignition events however have a noticeable sudden drop in EGT and a rapid rise in CHT. These are very destructive.

What I observe here is a stable set of data and the EGT is stable but low, and the CHT stable but high, thus advanced timing. Even if the CHT was 370dF at that EGT value I till suspect the timing is too far advanced, unless the probe placement is such that those numbers are normal for that installation.

What would be interesting if you have the programmable flexibility with your EMAGs is to set the base timing at 23DBTDC and the maximum at say 28, so that the EMAG reflects more of the design sparks at higher powers and not as much advance at lower powers and see what you get, in terms of CHT in climb and cruise, IAS at the same LOP fuel flows. If you have nothing better to do that is.

Hope this has helped a bit. ;)
 

mmarien

Murray M.
Joined
Dec 26, 2009
Messages
1,206
Location
Saskatoon SK CAN
Thanks David. Good to know that unless we set or do something disastrously wrong there is little chance of hurting the type of engine most of us fly behind. That fact that most POHs of certified aircraft suggest the 50F ROP cruise setting is testimony that they are not concerned about detonation.

I still think that there is nothing amiss with the temperatures on Joe's screen shot. Certainly high and you wouldn't want to run those temperatures in cruise but they are probably pretty typical for a climb out at that elevation and OAT. With EI and high compression pistons (9:1) I have to pour about 11-12 gph to keep my temps down in my little O320 during climb out. It's made up for in cruise with a 5-6 gph FF.

https://www.savvyanalysis.com/flight/980003/7e579ad0-758b-406b-91e9-dd08e16346f6
 
Top