This is decidedly *not* true.nearly 100% always mount the pitot tube on an inspection panel YMMV![]()
Except that I live in west Texas with lots of flying insects, and occasionally pick up a bug in the pitot tube. You're not going to dislodge that without removing the tube from the wing and blowing compressed air backwards through it. 10 years and just over 2000 flight hours, I'll bet I've pulled that pitot a dozen times for various reasons.A good reason to mount it in a location such that you don't *need* to remove it unless it's failed (or, in my case many years ago, subject to a recall/replacement). That was the only time I've ever removed it, in 1000+ hours.
I did precisely that on my -10 wings.Point taken. Maybe on a new installation one could route the tubes to the QD in such a way that you could just pull the vinyl tube from the QD and stick an air hose inside via an access panel? Just a thought...
I did say I, never said you had to do it that wayThis is decidedly *not* true.
All good hereAh, yes, my apologies...you did say "I", and my aging brain missed that (and read it as saying that nearly 100% of *all* installations used an inspection plate). I'm sorry.
On mine, I installed the pitot mast per the instructions provided by Dynon in my RV-7A, and used screws rather than rivets to attach the mast to the skin/backing plate. Because the wing spent a couple of years stored next to the other one, and then transported to the airport for final installation, without the pitot mast in place.
And if you go by the instructions for an RV, the backing plate *can't* be mounted on an inspection plate, anyway...no way to rivet it to the spar if you do that.
ETA: I just remembered...the pitot mast I have is basically the same as the Dynon one, but I got it from some other source...it's chromed, and I liked that look better. So the mounting holes on the mast may have already been countersunk. Backing plate was identical, though.