Hi All,
I just read through this thread, and I felt I needed try to highlight the sticking point for this development, at least from our point of view.
When I have discussed this matter in the past, it has not been clear whether it is only our data that is wanted, or if it was the mapping functionality that was also required.
Bear in mind that getting the actual mapping functionality (intelligent airspace clipping, feature layering, etc) would require the SkyDemon software actually running on the Skyview which would be a significant development task...
If it were only our data that was required then that's a bit different, but I am still a bit perplexed as to what PFMS's data is actually lacking. I know that we both probably have different processes for gathering and harvesting data, but largely, it all comes from the same source...
Perhaps its just the case that some of you already have a SkyDemon subscription and would simply prefer to use the data that you have already "licensed" through us?
Its great to get a better understanding of what your individual requirements are, so please feel free to use the SkyDemon contact form (shown upstream) to pass your thoughts to me. If you note "FAO Rob - Dynon" in the message then it should get to me. Alternatively, come see me at Friedrichshafen!
As you all know, I don't like making promises when it comes to future development work, and I wouldn't like to commit until we have established good business reasons for proceed, but your thoughts would be appreciated.