Search results

D100 series products will display glideslope but won't fly it on autopilot. So you'll get the full CDI+GS display (or HSI+GS if you're on that page), but you can only fly the lateral portion of the approach under AP control.

It affects all non-retractable versions, so all E and later models, except for the retractable R182 and the TR182. We hope to have an update shortly as our engineering and certification teams work through the issue. Generally, we have multiple projects in work at any given time, both internally...

As others have said, the SV-ADSB-472 is a serially-connected device and will not show up in the SkyView Network page.

☝️. This. The config files are stored internally. Exporting them to a USB memory stick when you're getting good results and again when you aren't should help tell the story. The only other thing I can think of - do your displays have the same tail numbers (if you have >1 display)? Displays...

It's the only way if you have an ARINC-based navigator (ie IFD/GNS/GTN/etc). If you have a serial-based device (portable GPS, SL-30), you can use the serial ports on the D180 directly.

There isn't a way to do boolean math or otherwise have conditionals on alerts within SkyView.

That's odd. What's your alarming mode set for for CHT? You might get in touch with our support team if you haven't already - they might be able to tell you more with a config file to look at.

Yes, the original EFIS-D10 has the same plumbing as the EFIS-D10A and can display AOA (it doesn't have audio out, though, fyi).

We believed it represented a superset of the whole fleet. We were wrong.

SkyView currently only supports fuel flow measured directly using a flow sensor.

Over the past few years, we've found it near-impossible to predict availability dates even on airplanes we have in-house getting R&D attention. For aircraft models beyond that, we've shuffled the list of future aircraft based on various factors. Therefore, we don't consider any thinking about...

If you have valid altitude, you have the required barometric altitude. Are all of the above actually reading valid values (OAT, FF, MAP)? Did you do anything particularly custom with the fuel flow sensor setup (naming it, etc)?

See this thread for that info: https://forum.flydynon.com/threads/diagnosis-of-oat-failure.2318/#post-11532

The short version is that our R&D airplane was a C182TR (turbo+retractable). We'd done analysis on fixed gear variants, and even inspected some to confirm compatibility. Unfortunately, we missed a key difference on the pitch axis. Know that fixing this is our top AP project priority right now.

Please try not to read this as a point-by-point rebuttal. I'm going to answer your questions as best I can. You have it exactly right. Early on, we thought we were getting the whole 35 line with the first approval. We were wrong. Fair. Even now, we thought we'd have more velocity on...

The short story: We expect the Barron to complete first, the Mooney after. The caveat and slightly longer version: things can change, based on circumstances, including external ones like FAA. The slightly longer story on the Barron is that long ago, we'd partnered with a customer to help get...

Correct. They are absolutely identical when the T8 is set to 25 Khz channel spacing.

They're shipping! Caveat, the initial production run is already spoken for, so we're effectively backordered. But customers have them in hand!