In my very short time on this Forum, I have found, with only one or two exceptions, the respondents to be, in general, curt.Sorry Skippy. I've placed you on ignore. You'll have to find someone else to poke sticks at.
I find it interesting that you consider it "impolite" for others not to answer the question, regardless of whether or not they have a correct answer - but you have no trouble at all jumping up and down waving your hands and proclaiming that you don't know anything about the subject but are happy to speculate about it.Hi Akash,
Can't imagine why some of the Forum experts don't answer - I feel it is impolite, not to respond to a question.
Sorry, not an electronics person so my response is speculation:
I assume, these days, a pressure sensitive (load?) cell. In past would have been a diaphragm or Bowden tube style devise.
One thing I have picked up, from other Forums, is that these devices are prone to erratic/erroneous reading, when in direct contact with the fuel.
The advice is to mount the sensor high, so that it is reading air/gas pressure rather than raw fuel AND so that the connecting tube has a chance to drain between engine starts.
I have found the above advice works for my installation.![]()
“Tolerance from ignorant behavior”SV Classic - I have become a Grumpy Old Man - I no longer have any tolerance for ignorant behaviour, especially when it comes from a position of arrogance.
Be kind. Be humble. Admit your failings/errors and I won't bite - simple!![]()
Around here it will help to let some of the negativity roll of your back from time to time.SV Classic - I have become a Grumpy Old Man - I no longer have any tolerance for ignorant behaviour, especially when it comes from a position of arrogance.
Be kind. Be humble. Admit your failings/errors and I won't bite - simple!![]()