When did this happen?Congrats @Dynon !
Hopefully this paves the wave for a faster approval process. My Cessna 180 is ready and waiting
Just announced today.When did this happen?
Just curious as to why you would use a C182TR and not a fixed gear platform. That doesn’t make sense seeing as the vast majority of 182’s are fixed gear. I really hope that some how you can fix this soon. Hell if you need a plane to use to get this fixed, I’ll bring you mine.The short version is that our R&D airplane was a C182TR (turbo+retractable). We'd done analysis on fixed gear variants, and even inspected some to confirm compatibility. Unfortunately, we missed a key difference on the pitch axis. Know that fixing this is our top AP project priority right now.
How many of the 182 fixed models does this affect?The short version is that our R&D airplane was a C182TR (turbo+retractable). We'd done analysis on fixed gear variants, and even inspected some to confirm compatibility. Unfortunately, we missed a key difference on the pitch axis. Know that fixing this is our top AP project priority right now.
So you continue to work on the Cessna 182 ahead of the Baron 58 and Mooney M20? My understanding is that only one can go through approval at a time.The short version is that our R&D airplane was a C182TR (turbo+retractable). We'd done analysis on fixed gear variants, and even inspected some to confirm compatibility. Unfortunately, we missed a key difference on the pitch axis. Know that fixing this is our top AP project priority right now.